I have been looking for legal assistance for a pro se lawsuit regarding the mis classification of domestic ferrets as wild animals. I have to say, the Legal Aid Society is worthless, but I found this state agency. It is worth a shot:
I am writing to bring attention to the current legal status of domestic ferrets in California, which are classified as wild and thus deemed illegal animals. As I delve deeper into my research, my limited legal knowledge becomes increasingly apparent, underscoring the need for expert guidance.
There are two primary concerns I’d like to address:
First: Challenging the Classification of Domestic Ferrets
I am initiating formal action to contest the classification of domestic ferrets as wild and illegal creatures in California. Grounds for this challenge include arbitrary classification, a lack of scientific basis, and potential violations of due process rights.
Second: CEQA/EIR Funding
We, the proponents of ferret legalization, have been informed by various Fish and Game Commission presidents that funding a California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) / Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is a prerequisite for consideration. We have willingly agreed to this condition, having invested $16,000 in a commissioned study by Sacramento State University. Regrettably, our efforts were dismissed, and we were recently criticized by F&G President Eric Sklar for not confirming our willingness to finance the report. I reminded him of our readiness, yet our attempts continue to be overlooked.
Charge: Failure to Adhere to Promised CEQA/EIR Funding Procedure
The California Fish and Game Commission expressly outlined that proponents of ferret legalization must bear the cost of the CEQA/EIR process. In strict adherence to this directive, the plaintiff diligently followed the Commission’s instructions in 2010.
Regrettably, subsequent interactions with Eric Sklar and the Commission have revealed a disconcerting pattern of inconsistency and neglect. Despite genuine interest in initiating the necessary procedures, the plaintiff has been met with repeated non-responsiveness from the Commission.
This deviation from the established procedure not only signifies a failure to uphold the Commission’s directives but also poses a significant obstacle to the plaintiff’s pursuit of ferret legalization. Such behavior indicates a lack of transparency and equitable treatment, impinging on the plaintiff’s right to due process and equal protection under the law.
The plaintiff maintains that this breach of trust and deviation from the agreed-upon protocol necessitates legal intervention to rectify the situation and ensure a fair and just process moving forward. This charge exemplifies the plaintiff’s unwavering dedication to the cause of ferret legalization and their resolve to hold those entrusted with overseeing this matter accountable.
Despite my efforts, securing legal assistance has proven challenging. I’ve been advised that challenging a state agency is a formidable task, and while we are not indigent, our resources are not limitless.
Any support or guidance you can provide would be immensely appreciated.
Thank you for your consideration.